Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 0
Certainly we will help. But what sort of help?** However, I think the subsidized insurance encourages development in places where it shouldn't.

Of course it does. It's classic moral hazard. It's inherent whenever government provides assistance that mitigates the risk of doing something. The question is what government does when it has already agreed to socialize the losses. It's an issue that comes up in lots of contexts, most recently with health care.

Here, the feds are not going to abandon flood-ravaged areas. Given that commitment, then, which is the more efficient solution - require flood-proofing new development and payment of special premiums as a condition to receiving federal flood insurance, or just respond on an ad hoc basis with disaster relief? The former runs the risk of moral hazard, but the latter may end up being far more costly.

Albaby
Print the post  

Announcements

When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement