OK. Here's the scoop. After getting our finances in order and beginning our portfolio with index funds, we've tiptoed into the UV4+ strategy. Last month, we emailed our new online discount broker (DATEK) about selling the highest cost basis equities first. They said they use a FIFO method of selling shares, but that our taxes are our own concern 'cause they only report sells to the IRS, not buys.Then last week, we emailed them (again!) with the request that they confirmreceipt of our email which included a standing direction to sell the highestcost basis shares first. In the email, we made it clear that we would keep ourown detailed records to make the shares identifiable, but that we simply wantedconfirmation from them that they received our request. They emailed back with"Your email has been received."Here's our question: DOES this count? Is this what's meant by written proof ofour direction to our broker? (For more background on this, there's a FAQ in www.fool.com/school/taxes/taxes23.htm)Are Datek's methods kosher and can we keep our own records for tax accounting purposes to specifically identify the shares we sell? ...'Discount' broker isn't much of a discount if we end up shelling out more in capital gainstax with FIFO. A more expensive regular broker that will keep our specific-IDrequest on file might even be better. Right? If that's the case, then choosingthe right broker is a significant part of our tax strategy....Thank you in advance for any feedback. Any responses are appreciated.(please post to the board)--- Nervous first-timers from Arizona
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Ra