Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 0
Can anyone explain the logic of this one to me? After you reduce the total amount paid for child care by the amount that you funded a 125-c plan, you must further reduce it by the salary of one parent if it was lower than the remainder. So, a stay-at-home parent for one child will cause the working parent to be penalized by his or her salary, reducing the tax benefit of a 125-c used to pay daycare for another child. The IRS has confirmed that this is their intent, just could not give any explanation as to why?
Print the post  

Announcements

Disclaimer:
In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement