UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next
Author: Rijer One star, 50 posts Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 76079  
Subject: Cloonan on Asset Allocation Date: 8/23/2003 10:40 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 3
I have been struggling with Asset Allocation issues for about a year. While a fixed percentage in various classes has done fairly well for me over the last 15 years, my approaching retirement is causing me to reconsider the allocation plans.

I recently read several articles in the AAII Journal by J. Cloonan. This is a Url to a copy of the last article: http://tinyurl.com/kzis

He suggests a very different approach and I would like feedback on his ideas and on the use of the www.riskgrades.com website for completing the analysis.

In his early articles, he suggested that the asset allocation model I have used is not the best approach. I have used classes of assets with historical returns, std deviations, and covariances by class; then tested portfolios by fitting them into the asset classes. A lot of the diversification comes from spreading a portion of the portfolio in each of the asset classes. A broad mix seems necessary. I call this the boxing model.

I think Cloonan suggests fitting the portfolio directly into the www.riskgrades.com website. This allows developing diversification at a lower level of detail and in my case results in a much simpler mix than I had been using. It also shows that the asset mix I now have is more conservative than I desire. Some of the specific differences include:

1. The boxing model wants a mix including foreign bonds and stocks. The direct model achieves adequate diversification without foreign investments.

2. The boxing models works best with a balanced mix of large and small, and value and growth equities. The direct model does better with a high proportion of small-cap, value equities.

3. My boxing model suggests I need to lower the equity mix below 50%. The direct model shows that a 60% mix has reasonable risk (for me).

In general, the direct model and Cloonan's commentary feels right to me. I can dump the foreign stuff I never really liked and can keep a high mix of small cap which have been my favorites.

I have studied this stuff a lot and still feel like a complete novice. What do you folks think of Cloonan's article and the RiskGrades website?
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next

Announcements

The Retire Early Home Page
Discussion on accelerating retirement day.
Pencils of Promise - Back to School Drive
"Pencils of Promise works with communities across the globe to build schools and create programs that provide education opportunities for children."
Post of the Day:
Berkshire Hathaway

IBM: Is Buffett Wrong, or Brilliant?
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement