Could someone please help me understand something about the fine print in annuities and other investment products. They all seem to make all sorts of promises and guarantees in large bold print, and then have some very tiny print at the bottom indicating that their promises and guarantees are subject to the companies ability to pay. I understand what that means in practical terms; however, I've confused at just how much of a risk one is taking with, for example, a major company such as Prudential, who appears to be financially stable and secure.More specifically all things remaining stable, I am not so much concerned that Prudential is going to all of a sudden lack the ability to honor payment on an annuity. My concern, however, is that all things may not remain stable in the economy as a whole. If one has $250,000 sitting in a cash account (not invested but just earning interest) and $250,000 invested in a Prudential annuity, which pot of money is the most vulnerable in the event of a total economic meltdown? Or, would both pots be equally vulnerable in such a condition?
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Ra