A group of medical researchers published an article in the Journal of the American Medical Association aka JAMA on surgical outcomes.  One of the authors is Harvard Medical School professor/surgeon Atul Gawande. He wrote a significant analysis of medical costs a few years ago. The significant finding is that hospitals make a lot more profit when a surgery patient has complications, compared to NO complications. The overall sample size was 34,256 so it was a fairly massive analysis.Brief summary of the facts:Patients with complications with private insurance contributed an additional $39,017 profit to the hospital.Patients with complications covered by Medicare contributed an additional $1,749 profit to the hospital.Quote from the abstract:Conclusions and Relevance In this hospital system, the occurrence of postsurgical complications was associated with a higher per-encounter hospital contribution margin for patients covered by Medicare and private insurance but a lower one for patients covered by Medicaid and who self-paid. Depending on payer mix, many hospitals have the potential for adverse near-term financial consequences for decreasing postsurgical complications.The data speaks for itself and Yoda cannot additional insight. JAMA Relationship Between Occurrence of Surgical Complications and Hospital Finances http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1679400 Fortune magazine take on this storyhttp://management.fortune.cnn.com/2013/04/17/hospitals-healt...
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Ra