Crap from Christopher Monckton?Is figure 2 incorrect? No.The only thing interesting about it is that you would deign to insert that buffoon's name as an example of your scientific rigour.I used it specifically to show figure 2, the IPCC prediction. It is clearly not what we have seen actually occur.(Kyoto) is far from a raging successTalk about understatement.It's depressing, but it's still not evidence of "rampant corruption and social engineering going on in the GW communities." It is based on a fallacy. How is that not corrupt social engineering?Fwiw:About the only thing one can say about "climate scientists" in general is that they have gotten the sign right. http://boards.fool.com/about-the-only-thing-one-can-say-abou...
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Rat