Dave,I'm struggling to understand the logic behind how a 30 yr FRM can possibly be cheaper than a 5 yr ARM.From an investor's standpoint, why would you want to encourage the borrower to lock in their extremely low rate for 30 years as opposed to a 5 year lock and then variable by offering the 30 year at a lower rate?Unless the investor thinks rates will be lower in 5 years?Please explain.Thanks,CP
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Ra