Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next
Author: newsreporter Big gold star, 5000 posts Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 355  
Subject: Debt worries Date: 4/27/2011 4:16 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 2
Limited's Share Buyback Is a Sign to Sell
http://goo.gl/W0kus


Limited Brands (LTD), parent of Victoria's Secret and Bath and Body Works, is going on a $500 million shopping spree repurchasing stock; however, it's putting the charges on an overloaded credit card. Limited floated a $1 billion 6.625% noncallable 10 year bond and will use half for stock repurchases. The company already owes $2.5 billion; its balance sheet is highly leveraged with an eye popping 170% debt/equity ratio. Compare that to Ann Taylor (ANN), The Buckle (BKE), Aeropostale (ARO), and Chico's FAS (CHS), all of which have no debt. Saks (SKS) comes in at a 31% debt/equity. I used to think Macey's (M) and Nordstrom (JWN) were crazy high at 134% and 137% respectively; they don't look so bad after Limited.

Certainly, $500 million dollars buys a lot of Limited stock. Once the spree is over, Limited will be left with a heaping $3.5 billion debt load, a drag on its cash flow for years to come. Last year, Limited paid $209 million in interest; with their additional debt, they will now be shelling out $275 million. Last year, interest expense came to 16% of operating income. If operating income stayed the same, interest would rise to 21%.

In the past, Limited appeared investor friendly because it increased its dividends, made two special dividends last year, and repurchased shares. No more. Adding more debt on to an already highly leveraged balance sheet solely to buy back shares is too risky for my tastes. After the added debt, EV/EBITDA will be one of the highest in the retail industry. I'd be less concerned if Limited was planning to use the borrowed funds for a major expansion.

Fifteen calls and e-mails to Limited Brand's investors relations went unanswered. Not a fan of escalating debt, I sold my shares.
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next

Announcements

Foolanthropy 2014!
By working with young, first-time moms, Nurse-Family Partnership is able to truly change lives – for generations to come.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Post of the Day:
Macro Economics

Looking at Currency Ratios
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement