Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) | Ignore Thread Prev Thread | Next Thread
Author: Hohum777 Big gold star, 5000 posts Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 3153  
Subject: DHT news items Date: 12/24/2012 7:15 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 2
Just saw this on DHT's site- court filing to reject OSG's return of two bareboat charter vessels.

http://www.dhtmaritime.com/index.php?id=441&pressrelease...

DHT acquired both Suezmax vessels from OSG, and paid a premium for the vessels. IMHO, the bareboat
charters helped make each vessel deal more palatable.

--

I also notice that two VLCCs no longer show on the TI pool list-
http://www.tankersinternational.com/fleet_list.php?type=1&am...

At least one of those two VLCCs was still on TC to OSG. Wonder who manages the spot trading
vessel if it isn't in the TI pool?
Print the post Back To Top
Author: Hohum777 Big gold star, 5000 posts Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: 2808 of 3153
Subject: Re: DHT news items Date: 1/11/2013 1:44 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 0
Charters for two VLCCs

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-11/core-petroleum-said...


Somewhat odd- the Dec 11th announcement related to two Suezmax vessels. The above link relates
to two VLCCs. Ignoring that, charter revenue for DHT, regardless of its vessel source, is
something DHT desperately needs at this juncture.

Print the post Back To Top
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) | Ignore Thread Prev Thread | Next Thread
Advertisement