Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) | Ignore Thread Prev Thread | Next Thread
Author: esxokm Big red star, 1000 posts Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 49534  
Subject: Disney Hyperion strategy Date: 3/8/2013 8:07 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 1
Read an interesting piece about Disney and its Hyperion book division. Looks like the company wants to sell off older titles and only work with ones that directly tie-in with some other Disney property. So, although this wasn't the example given, I would imagine that novelizations of Disney movies would count as something Hyperion wants to put out, not a novel about a war between two alien races on Saturn written by an unknown (unless Disney acquired it to make into a movie, I suppose).

http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/pu...

This got me thinking. Since Disney wants to concentrate on Disney-branded films, and since Disney sold off the Miramax/Dimension library, should Disney sell off its Touchstone library? If not as a whole, what about on a selective basis?

Let's take "Pretty Woman" as an example. I don't really think there's much Disney is going to do with "Pretty Woman" in the age of Marvel and Lucasfilm and "Pirates of the Caribbean 5." What if Disney sold the rights to "Pretty Woman"? Would that make sense?

Or, what if Disney licensed some of its Touchstone properties to other companies? Remember "Air Force One?" How about licensing sequel rights to "Air Force Two?" Remember "Armageddon?" How about licensing remake rights?

I'm sure Disney generates decent revenue numbers licensing these pictures around the world to premium-TV, free-TV channels, etc., but as time goes on, one has to assume some of these properties will just depreciate fast. Perhaps convincing an investment group to overpay for them now will be better for shareholders in the long run.
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post Back To Top
Author: MoeBruin Big gold star, 5000 posts Top Favorite Fools Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: 48460 of 49534
Subject: Re: Disney Hyperion strategy Date: 3/8/2013 6:42 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 0
Yes I would go along with you on this. If the price is right definitely know reason not to sell off the Touchstone films. However, also know reason for Disney to have a fire seller either.

If I was them I would be keeping my eyes out for someone who may want to overpay for them and for all we know that is what they may already be doing.

Moe

Print the post Back To Top
Author: esxokm Big red star, 1000 posts Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: 48461 of 49534
Subject: Re: Disney Hyperion strategy Date: 3/9/2013 2:24 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 0
Thanks for the reply Moe. One thing I should correct: "Air Force One" might be in Sony's library since I believe that studio had domestic rights to the film. Not sure how that works. But, anyway, the concept of selling the library remains.

Print the post Back To Top
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) | Ignore Thread Prev Thread | Next Thread
Advertisement