No. of Recommendations: 0
Dr Bob's results of choosing VL screens based on past 12 mo performance doesn't come up
with the same results I do using a smaller set of SIP screens. I find that the past 12 months
performance has some predictive value for next Month's gain. But only about a 7 to 10%
advantage over picking randomly.

I should also point out that my posts on the advantages of using a 9 Month WWL was based
on choosing from a list of screens that had already been chosen as much better than average
screens to start with.(although once chosen I kept them in the selection pool even if they tanked
post discovery) They had all continued to have value with at least a hold 10, and 2 month
period, better than average Sharpe. In fact a random selection from those screens would have given a
CAGR of 35. So using a selection based on a combination of long term CAGR, GSD and
9 Month CAGR and GSD in this case seems to add another 5 to 10% and reduce the GSD a little.
The point is that I think 90% of the effort should be in the initial selection of screens.

For the same rational Zee's SIP based gold screens continue to hold up post discovery.

Print the post  


What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.