Dwdonhoff wrote:Apparently IGU isn't the only one with reading failure...You know, Dave, I've looked back multiple times over what you've written. If I have a reading failure, it seems to kick in only on your writing. I continue to see vague handwaving, excessive jargon, and a complete failure to provide any evidence. Must be me.If I wanted to support a claim such as yours about dividends, I would do an IUL model run on actual historical data both with and without dividends included. Then I'd show that the real life balance of the IUL matches the "with dividends" run. That people would believe.Your constant reiteration of your assertions backed by no evidence whatsoever convinces nobody. Have you asked yourself what it is about your postings that leaves nobody (other than the omnipresent weak-minded participant) believing you? When Ray makes a post with verifiable data and formulas somehow people believe it more than yours. What could be the difference? It must just be that people here can't read (only your posts) properly.-IGU-
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Rat