Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (55) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next
Author: coralville Big red star, 1000 posts Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 197107  
Subject: Re: How to Debate an Evolutionist Date: 2/21/2005 12:13 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 87
Evolutionists attack intelligent design by appealing to each of these three aspects of rhetoric. Accordingly, they attack intelligent design with respect to logos by claiming that science utterly fails to support it, whether on evidential or theoretical grounds. What's more, they attack intelligent design with respect to ethos by charging its proponents with being morally and intellectually deficient. And, finally, they attack intelligent design with respect to pathos by instilling the fear that intelligent design means not just the end of science but also the end of rational discourse in a free and open society.

Wouldn't it be simpler, and more honest, to evaluate objectively the merits of the evolutionists' arguments rather than assuming they are simply rhetorical strategems?

I think everyone should read the Dembski link because it clearly illustrates the difference between the Intelligent Design argument and a scientific theory. Controversies in science are generally resolved by appeals to empirical evidence in the form of experiments and observations. The way for me to convince you about my theory is to generate better evidence in support, not better rhetoric. That's how Einstein's relativity replaced Newtonian physics. That's how germ theory replaced an imbalance of bodily fluids as an explanation for disease. That's how Kuhnian paradigm shifts occur. It is noteworthy that Dembski does not suggest this. Instead of more experiments and observations he prescribes "logos, ethos, and pathos". That ID should best be defended by rhetorical rather than scientific strategies suggests it is a more rhetorical than scientific theory.
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (55) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next


Foolanthropy 2014!
By working with young, first-time moms, Nurse-Family Partnership is able to truly change lives – for generations to come.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Post of the Day:
Value Hounds

One Word: Plastics!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.