Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 2
Except that justice doesn't work this way.

Humanly speaking, you are correct.


Then, humanly speaking, God (if he existed) must be unjust. So clearly God's justice would be wrong for humans.

When a federal judge hands down a sentence, is it revenge or prevention? It might have a preventative effect, but the purpose is to satisfy the requirements of the law. You break the law, you pay the price.

The whole point of having laws is to prevent crimes. There is absolutely no other reason. A civilized society does not want crimes to occur in the first place. Laws prevent crimes in two ways: by deterring people from committing them in the first place, and by imprisoning, executing, and generally incapacitating people who have showed a propensity for committing crimes. The ONLY reason people need to "pay the price" is that if there were no price, there would be more incentive to commit crimes.

So in sense, God decided the rules, the penalty, and he also decided what would satisfy that penalty.

Could the god have decided on a different set of rules? Suppose the rules it made said that murder, theft and rape are good ideas? Would we still be bound to follow them?
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement