UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (29) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next
Author: wolsey1 Big gold star, 5000 posts Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 1977293  
Subject: Re: GIngrich: Flip flopped on taxes Date: 10/8/2012 12:13 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 0
Except that you tossed in things like "deficits don't matter", which nobody in this thread claimed.

That came after the context of me thinking you thought it was senseless to try to understand Romney's numbers, which would be as senseless as Cheney's comment that deficits don't matter. That's the connection.


That's as may be, but where does it say that Mitt will raise my taxes?

You took that too literally. I was thinking you thought it was senseless to look at the numbers, so I suggested the possibility of Romney raising your taxes as a way of making the point that reviewing the numbers might be a reasonable exercise. Please see it in the context in which it was said.


No, I'm shooting at left wingers who want to argue about Romney's tax treatment of security X while ignoring Obama's plans altogether.

A voter can reasonably want to understand the policy position of one candidate, and that has no bearing on what that voter feels towards the other main candidate. You're not going to vote for Obama, but it's reasonable for you to accurately understand his positions, if you're interested in doing so. Who knows, some opinions might be changed.


how does he propose to close the ... budget gap?

Good question,


Actually I take that back, it's not a good question. But I'm different because I think Republican policies caused most of the deficit, and Romney would continue with the same ideology. I also think Obama would have a much lower budget deficit to be criticized on if he had not given in to Republican demands on things like extension of marginal tax rate cuts, for example.


The Buffet Rule is moronic ... Won't matter in the slightest with respect to the deficit.

I agree. Thinking wealthier people are going to more fairly pay their share through W2 income misses the boat.
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (29) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next

Announcements

Foolanthropy 2014!
By working with young, first-time moms, Nurse-Family Partnership is able to truly change lives – for generations to come.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Post of the Day:
Macro Economics

Looking at Currency Ratios
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement