http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/333608/one-party-statel...Now comes the news that, following his impressive 100 per cent share of the vote in 59 Philadelphia precincts, Barack Obama was able to eke out a 100 per cent total victory in a mere 37 precincts in his home town of Tikrit – whoops, I mean Chicago. NBC reports:In 37 Chicago Precincts, Romney Received No VotesHeavy concentration of Big Bird fans perhaps. One commenter observes:Statistically, even if among 10's of thousands of voters all wanted to vote for Obama, it would not be possible to receive 100% of the vote because at least a few would make a mistake and vote incorrectly for Romney.Just to be clear: I think Obama won the election, and his victory represents the will of the American people. Which is why the Democrats should have heeded Mubarak’s words and not over-stolen it. I was not one of those who objected to the presence of international observers at this month’s election, as if we were a banana republic: By comparison with Canada, Australia, and most other free societies, the integrity of the ballot in the United States is a joke, and ought to be a source of shame.----------------------------------------------------------That's exactly what i said about there would be mistakes and people would vote for Romney even though they meant Obama. How many precincts over the country have zero Romney votes now? Ohio had something like 8 or 9 precincts. It's over 100 precincts with no Romney votes. There is no way there's no fraud involved.
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Rat