Good Day. I read the following article and wasn’t quite sure how to interpret what I read.Articlehttp://www.fool.com/investing/general/2012/09/27/dont-get-to...I don’t fully appreciate all that was discussed but have some questions regarding statements made by the author. In general the point made is that some sources of cash-flow could be signs of trouble and I believe they are pointing to accounts payable, accounts receivable, taxes, stock based compensation, and asset sales.I can’t speak to the taxes or stock based compensation concerns and would appreciate it if somebody could provide some clarity to what are the concerns.Accounts ReceivableThe author states that decreasing AR can be a concern and then mentions later that the increased AR is something to watch as well. So which is it? I agree that AR has increased, but I also looked at the data and determined the following:Time to be paid ratio = (Sales) / (Accounts Receivable) = 4069M / 58M = 70.15 (2011)Weeks to get paid = (52 weeks) / (Time to be paid ratio( = .74. This is lower than the average for 5 years. So it seems to me the Metro PCS did a better job in 2011 for accounts receivableAccounts Payable Using the following formula: (Cost of Sales) / (Inventory) = 622 / 161 = Turn Over Ratio = 3.86 (2012)Weeks to turn inventory into sales = (52 Weeks)/ (Turn Over Ratio) = 28 weeks.I agree this is an increase, but why is this a bad thing? Seems they are managing suppliers such that they have about 10 weeks of buffer between when inventory is sold and when they need to pay that inventory.Again I appreciate others thoughts on this as well as thoughts on the taxes and stock compensation discussion in the article.Thanks,Jared
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Ra