It seems that I'm not the only one with a 401k plan that has a not-so-great basket of mutual funds to pick from.I see that the standard Foolish Thing is to consider reducing 401k participation and then using the extra money for self-directed common stock purchases.Instead, has anyone ever confronted their company's 401k administrator and poured a can of Fool in their lap? Would the process of making new funds available to participants have any reasonable comparison to mating elephants(*)?Fidelity seems to have a couple of real humdingers (like FDCPX with its hot tech stocks or FSPHX with its hot health care holdings), and we get to choose from BIG FAT BLOATED COWS like the 74 BAZILLION dollar Magellan, which Robert Stansky could use for the purchase of some small country, were he permitted to do so.Would the employer balk at offering high beta funds because we'd be bouncing our money around too much? Does Fidelity charge employers more for offering more volatile funds that encourage more shifting around (at Fidelity's expense, I might add)? Would I stand to gain more by discussing my 401k with my cat? What is the maximum airspeed velocity of a stock certificate when folded into a paper-plane?RM-------------(*) The mating of Elephantidae has three notable characteristics:a. It's done at a very high level.b. There's enough kicking and screaming involved that you certainly don't want to be underfoot or within earshot when it occurs.c. It takes 22 months to produce results.
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Ra