No. of Recommendations: 1
The 2nd Amendment is among our most sacred rights.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/12/us-usa-shooting-or...

Reuters) - A gunman opened fire inside an Oregon shopping mall on Tuesday in the middle of the busy Christmas season, killing at least two people, critically wounding a young woman and terrorizing holiday shoppers before shooting himself to death, police said.

....police evacuated terrified shoppers, who were reported by local media and via Twitter to have hidden in the back rooms of shops as gunshots rang out in the 1.4 million- square-foot mall.

"Shooting in the middle of clackamas town center. I'm stuck in the back room of build a bear!" one person tweeted.

</snip>


intercst
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 40
A gunman opened fire inside an Oregon shopping mall on Tuesday in the middle of the busy Christmas season, killing at least two people, critically wounding a young woman and terrorizing holiday shoppers before shooting himself to death. . .

Of course the tea-baggers believe that everything would have been better if dozens of ill-trained shoppers and teenagers would have pulled out their own guns and opened up fire resulting in a hail of gunfire throughout the Mall. I mean . . . what could possibly go wrong with that?
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
he also shot himself ......

whacked out.

The islamos use bombs, take out 20 at a time, wound another 30.......


ANd of course, they are 'freedom loving' too!.....


I don't see you posting about their successes, though!




t.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
he was probably suffering from BUsh Derangement syndrome like you, intercst.......

and it went' terminal'.......


Probably took out two Oregon libs in the process......




t
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
Another disgusting display from a liberal using the death of innocents to attempt score political points.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Of course the tea-baggers believe that everything would have been better if dozens of ill-trained shoppers and teenagers would have pulled out their own guns and opened up fire resulting in a hail of gunfire throughout the Mall. I mean . . . what could possibly go wrong with that?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course lack-of-critical-thinking-skills-baggers like yourself think that eliminating guns eliminates crazy people.....knives, explosives, poison, strangulation, you get it. Your point is beyond mindless.

Mark
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Another disgusting display from a liberal using the death of innocents to attempt score political points.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Title of posting: "Freedom Lovin' Man Hits Oregon Mall"

Should have been: "Logical Thought Process Hatin' Man Posts On TMF"

Mark
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Only two victims? Not even worth the effort.

American shooters these days are being unfairly handicapped. If it weren't for commie libruls he could have been a record contender. Crowded XMAS mall. Suhweeeeet.

I mean, how's a solo shooter ever going to compete with the likes of a San Ysidro McDonalds shooter for fame if he can't get decent tools?

Heck, the McDonalds shooter had polio when he was a kid, and a motorcycle accident later on that left him with a bad arm and a bad leg, yet he was still able to rack up 21 kills and 19 winged!!

That's what I'm talkin' about!!

Urban action shooting competitors unite!

It's just not fair that a guy today can't buy a pair of Uzi's at Cabella's to complement his .45's and 12 gauge pumper.

btw, great sale on pink breast cancer 12 gauge shells. $5.99 a box and free shipping!!
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
It's just not fair that a guy today can't buy a pair of Uzi's at Cabella's to complement his .45's and 12 gauge pumper.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or if non-thinkers like yourself had their way there would be no guns. In which case crazed lunatics would use explosives and kill way more people. Smart.

Mark
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
"It's just not fair that a guy today can't buy a pair of Uzi's at Cabella's to complement his .45's and 12 gauge pumper."

The drug dealers and drug lords and crime bosses have no problems getting Uzis and AK-47s (fully automatic).

What makes you think that taking away guns from citizens ever stops them?


If they can import 1000 tons of pot a year, 10 tons of cocaine......what's a few hundred pounds of Uzi's? or tons of uzis.


And you are right. YOu can't buy fully automatic weapons without an expensive, hard to get, federal license. And it has been that way for decades and decades.





t.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Another disgusting display from a liberal using the death of innocents to attempt score political points

Here's another disgusting display from yesterday:

http://boards.fool.com/portland-shooting-30426791.aspx

Breath-taking hypocrisy. But then no one expects differently.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 2
Of course the tea-baggers believe that everything would have been better if dozens of ill-trained shoppers and teenagers would have pulled out their own guns and opened up fire resulting in a hail of gunfire throughout the Mall. I mean . . . what could possibly go wrong with that?

Yet they still refuse to allow individuals the use of nuclear weapons for self defense. Tea-baggers are totally unAmerican and should self-deport.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Of course the tea-baggers believe that everything would have been better if dozens of ill-trained shoppers and teenagers would have pulled out their own guns...</I.

Are tea-baggers all gun nuts? There's likely an overlap, but I think you're conflating two distinct wings of wingnuttery.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 2
Of course the tea-baggers believe that everything would have been better if dozens of ill-trained shoppers and teenagers would have pulled out their own guns and opened up fire resulting in a hail of gunfire throughout the Mall. I mean . . . what could possibly go wrong with that?

Only based on studies that have shown that the sooner someone shoots back the sooner the bloodshed ends and the fewer people hurt or killed. Silly to rely on science though, I suppose we should rely on knee-jerk idiocy and hoplophobia like, well, you and your ilk.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
Here's an incident that will cheer up the left from a Lille of years ago:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacoma_Mall_shooting
During the course of the shooting, Brendan (Dan) McKown, a legally armed citizen, intervened. McKown drew his 9mm CZ pistol and verbally commanded Maldonado to put down his gun. Maldonado's response was to fire on McKown, striking him once in the leg and four times in the torso, damaging McKown's spine and leaving him paralyzed. In addition to McKown, five other people were shot but not seriously injured, and a seventh person received a non-gunshot injury. At least one other person in the mall at the time also pulled a gun on Maldonado but did not fire for fear of hitting innocent bystanders.[1]
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Of course lack-of-critical-thinking-skills-baggers like yourself think that eliminating guns eliminates crazy people.....knives, explosives, poison, strangulation, you get it. Your point is beyond mindless.

Yes, but yours isn't.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
It's just not fair that a guy today can't buy a pair of Uzi's at Cabella's to complement his .45's and 12 gauge pumper.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or if non-thinkers like yourself had their way there would be no guns.


LOL.

What a stupid thing to say to me.

Critters, clay, I'm in. If it flies, it dies.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Of course lack-of-critical-thinking-skills-baggers like yourself think that eliminating guns eliminates crazy people.....knives, explosives, poison, strangulation, you get it. Your point is beyond mindless.
-----
Yes, but yours isn't.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Okay look, I at least took the time to make an argument: eliminating guns doesn't eliminate lunatics.

Here's your reply: "Yes, but yours isn't."

I'm sorry, was "I'm rubber, you're glue" not available?

Could you please have some self respect and make a counter argument?

Mark
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
The drug dealers and drug lords and crime bosses have no problems getting Uzis and AK-47s (fully automatic).

Youu watch too many movies.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
LOL.

What a stupid thing to say to me.

Critters, clay, I'm in. If it flies, it dies.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact that you own guns and hunt doesn't negate the fact that you are making an argument with massive logical holes. Restricting guns doesn't reduce the number of people who want to commit murder.

Mark
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Guns don't kill people? Malls kill people?

Ken
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
The fact that you own guns and hunt doesn't negate the fact that you are making an argument with massive logical holes.

What exactly do you think my argument is?

Restricting guns doesn't reduce the number of people who want to commit murder.

Correct. However, weapons restrictions reduces the availabilty of certain weapons systems so that we don't end up like certain countries where children and mental defectives run around with kalashnikovs, grenade launchers, assorted explosive devices.....

I can handle a person who has a knife or bat quite easily. An Uzi? Asses and elbows, amigo. Asses and elbows.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 2
Okay look, I at least took the time to make an argument

No. You didn't make an argument. What you posted to me was this: Of course lack-of-critical-thinking-skills-baggers like yourself think that eliminating guns eliminates crazy people.....knives, explosives, poison, strangulation, you get it. Your point is beyond mindless.

That is not an argument. It is an unfounded assertion about what you believe that "lack-of-critical-thinking-skills-baggers" think. It is both a stupid assertion and irrelevant to any point in this post. The fact that you believe your previous post somehow constitutes an argument clearly places you in your own made-up group (ie. the lack-of-critical-thinking-skills-baggers").
Print the post Back To Top
Advertisement