From a legal perspective, "we" did not attack Libya, NATO did. We assisted NATO with the attacks. So from that standpoint, we did not send the military into Libya.The NATO treaty only provided for self defense - for supporting one member if they were attacked.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Atlantic_Treatyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATOhttp://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_17120.htm...The North Atlantic Treaty provides no support for the intervention in Libya, AFAICT.The UN Security Resolutions could provide better legal cover...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council...Still reading...UN Charter could support it, I think. My opinion of Obama would move up on that.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Natio...Congressional support was granted via the combination of the UN Charter ratification in 1945 and Security Council Resolution 1973. I could buy that.
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Rat