FWIW, commercially managing the DHT vessels would mainly add a fee-for-service type revenue stream.It probably would add a small, safer revenue component unless FRO created some type of profit-sharecomponent to the deal. The reason it makes some sense is that when vessels chartered toOSG had their charters, DHT mgmt sorta opted for an easy-out and just left their vessels inOSG pools, or scrapped the vessels. If OSG continues spiraling down, and into BK, then the easy-outis not there anymore, and DHT mgmt need to find other options. Since DHT Eagle is a VLCCon leaseback to FRO, it seems logical to ask them to manage other tanker vessels.--The NNA position in the Trading ac is gone. Closed out the position there, but still have atoken NNA stake in the Roth ac. Their charter coverage means NNA have good protection on a roughtanker market and the ability to maintain their dividend payout (for probably at least 5-6 morequarters).
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Ra