Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 16
This is more of a biographical FAQ than a strict, literal, actual, FAQ, intended to artistically express the entire history of the Gamblin' Fools board in one convenient place. It's entitled: 'Debates Less Productive than the Death Penalty' a play in one part.

I co-opted this idea from coralville, truth be told.

Act I

Heihojin: "Welcome to the board! Any Poker Players?"

Leehjones: "Enough about Poker. I propose we start an endless debate that spans hundred of posts while making little to no progress."

Knudsendd: "As crazy as this sounds, I can usually tell when such an endless debate is about to start."

Heihojin: "Nonsense. Endless debates are random events. Besides, you can't have an endless debate in only hundreds of posts."

Trick: "This's a common fallacy, heyho. You're comparing protons to neutrons. The rules of inifinity don't apply to only a few posts."

Raken: "I knew an Egyptian fly fisherman who had a method to consistently produce endless debates in only two or three posts. I'll prove it if I ever translate those Hieroglyphic records he sent me."

JKorenthal: "That's sounds unusual. If you ever translate the metholodogy, post it, and I'll develop a small consortium of artificial robots to run the infinite algorithm over a set number of posts!"

Heihojin: "This is ridiculous. It is statistically impossible to have an infinite debate in a limited number of posts. Can we please talk about poker?"

Trick: "Statistics have nothing to do with this. You're looking at it from TMF's perspective. Over time, they will never have an endless debate on their site, because there are only a finite number of posts and the sample size is large enough to apply statistics. But any given poster can have an infinite debate and then simply walk away."

Heihojin: "What hapened to LeehJones?"

Raken: "Binghamton Rangers are scrimmaging intra-squad tonight. Anyone giving 2?"

Trick: "Fat chance Raken. The Rangers are on a roll."

JKorenthal: "That's impossible. Minor league hockey games are independent. Here, I'll write a short 80000 line program an prove it. There. See?"

Trick: "Exactly. But that doesn't prove that you can't play the rolls."

JKorenthal: "Arg! What do you mean? I quit my job to write that program."

Trick: "It's only one game. Expected outcome has nothing to do with the actual results."

Howardroark: "So you're saying that if Bighamton Rangers played the Gardner Brothers in only one game, we'd have no information that would help us predict the outcome?"

Raken: "Let's cut the fancy verbiage. Information can mean anything. I once parlayed a dime I found at Harrah's into two Buffet's and a Starlight Express showing."

Trick: "What if I offered to pay you a dollar to pick the winner of Rangers or the Gardner brothers, and if you lost I could stick you with a shank? Woud you do it?"

Howardroark: "Of course not. (.003423^87)/432.33+4323-.0063)/433^#@$@!#) = -.001. But that's because you invoked a steeper penalty, which changed my expected outcome."

Trick: "This is Hockey, Howard! Penalties have nothing to do with it."

JKorenthal: "Hey, let's not get testy. Anyone know any good Gamblin' Tunes?"

Trick: I'm not testy, moron. You people will never get it. Statistics has nothing to do with one Rangers game. The Rangers can stop playing at any time, like LeehJones.

Heihojin: Any poker players?

Albaby1: Hey folks. Anyone know the odds of having an endless debate in a single post?

Print the post  


When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.