This is more of a biographical FAQ than a strict, literal, actual, FAQ, intended to artistically express the entire history of the Gamblin' Fools board in one convenient place. It's entitled: 'Debates Less Productive than the Death Penalty' a play in one part.I co-opted this idea from coralville, truth be told.Act IHeihojin: "Welcome to the board! Any Poker Players?"Leehjones: "Enough about Poker. I propose we start an endless debate that spans hundred of posts while making little to no progress." Knudsendd: "As crazy as this sounds, I can usually tell when such an endless debate is about to start."Heihojin: "Nonsense. Endless debates are random events. Besides, you can't have an endless debate in only hundreds of posts."Trick: "This's a common fallacy, heyho. You're comparing protons to neutrons. The rules of inifinity don't apply to only a few posts."Raken: "I knew an Egyptian fly fisherman who had a method to consistently produce endless debates in only two or three posts. I'll prove it if I ever translate those Hieroglyphic records he sent me."JKorenthal: "That's sounds unusual. If you ever translate the metholodogy, post it, and I'll develop a small consortium of artificial robots to run the infinite algorithm over a set number of posts!"Heihojin: "This is ridiculous. It is statistically impossible to have an infinite debate in a limited number of posts. Can we please talk about poker?"Trick: "Statistics have nothing to do with this. You're looking at it from TMF's perspective. Over time, they will never have an endless debate on their site, because there are only a finite number of posts and the sample size is large enough to apply statistics. But any given poster can have an infinite debate and then simply walk away."Heihojin: "What hapened to LeehJones?"Raken: "Binghamton Rangers are scrimmaging intra-squad tonight. Anyone giving 2?"Trick: "Fat chance Raken. The Rangers are on a roll."JKorenthal: "That's impossible. Minor league hockey games are independent. Here, I'll write a short 80000 line program an prove it. There. See?"Trick: "Exactly. But that doesn't prove that you can't play the rolls."JKorenthal: "Arg! What do you mean? I quit my job to write that program."Trick: "It's only one game. Expected outcome has nothing to do with the actual results."Howardroark: "So you're saying that if Bighamton Rangers played the Gardner Brothers in only one game, we'd have no information that would help us predict the outcome?"Raken: "Let's cut the fancy verbiage. Information can mean anything. I once parlayed a dime I found at Harrah's into two Buffet's and a Starlight Express showing."Trick: "What if I offered to pay you a dollar to pick the winner of Rangers or the Gardner brothers, and if you lost I could stick you with a shank? Woud you do it?"Howardroark: "Of course not. (.003423^87)/432.33+4323-.0063)/433^#@$@!#) = -.001. But that's because you invoked a steeper penalty, which changed my expected outcome."Trick: "This is Hockey, Howard! Penalties have nothing to do with it."JKorenthal: "Hey, let's not get testy. Anyone know any good Gamblin' Tunes?"Trick: I'm not testy, moron. You people will never get it. Statistics has nothing to do with one Rangers game. The Rangers can stop playing at any time, like LeehJones.Heihojin: Any poker players?Albaby1: Hey folks. Anyone know the odds of having an endless debate in a single post?
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Ra