I work with quite a few general officers and it seems they have become more and more self-centered and entitled over the years. The current 3 and 4 stars where I work all have their own drivers and multiple cars to choose from, a household staff of soldiers who cook and clean, a laundry staff who takes care of all of their clothing, a yard staff who does all of the yard work, aides who carry their bags and equipment when they travel, a communications staff (usually 3-5 soldiers) who go everywhere with them, and quite often when their spouses travel between posts the entry gates are blocked off while they (the spouses) drive through.None of them (1 to 4 stars) abide by the security regulations that everyone else has to follow and their staff also usually doesn't follow the regs. I have had multiple fights with them about this and I always seem to lose.The odd thing about all of that to me is that back when I was in the military (1970's-1980's) the generals I knew (far fewer than I know today of course) all said constantly that NO ONE is above the regulations and they all followed them scrupulously. I remember when I was a lowly O-1 and I refused to allow an O-6 to pick up a document marked "Eyes Only" for the Wing Commander. This guy screamed and threatened me but when the Wing Commander got involved he praised me in front of the entire unit and I actually got a letter in my file over the incident. If I tried that today I'd probably get a letter but it wouldn't be a good one.I'm curious why this has happened. I'm currently reading a book called "The Generals" and it's about how things have changed since WWII and the methods Marshall and Eisenhower used to promote and demote general officers. It's striking just how different things are today.Calabogie
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Mornings