GO TO THIS LINK:Sigh. Again.1) your link shows the a2 line, not the a1 line. Your mixing apples and oranges.2) OK, let's use the A2 data. In slide 7/8 it shows sigma 2 for 2012 at slightly above .2C. Actual is still at the very bottom of that error bar.Putnid linked to skepticalscience. You know what their explanation is?climate scientists at the time believed a doubling of atmospheric CO2 would cause a larger global heat imbalance than current estimates,http://www.skepticalscience.com/contary-to-contrarians-ipcc-......which is to say, "we were wrong before but this time for sure we know what we are talking about. Maybe. Kinda. We hope." it must be embarrassing to be pulled up in public about itNot really, since I've been able to show that the data is what it is.You've done absolutely nothing to show that the IPCC didn't overstate its case. Must be embarrassing to go to all that effort and not actually accomplish anything.Seriously, do tell me when you're going to show that the IPCC didn't overstate its case. I'm waiting with bated breath to see how you pull it off.
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Rat