Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 0
Good article. I worked throguh my own distaste for the act, starting two scrolly posts that I abandoned as sorta beside the point before posting. At the moment I'm inclined to agree that indefinite detention under due processes rendered by the executive rather than the judiciary makes sense.

The danger of giving the executive power without judicial oversight is, well, an oppressive executive. But this is always the danger of having an effective executive, and it would be a foolish philosophy indeed that did not place safety from attack by foreigners high on our list of values.

It does require a bunch of faith in the executive to accept this. It is a feature, and not a bug, that people are constantly chipping away at this kind of raw executive power. It is dangerous for our enemies and it is dangerous for us.

R:
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement