No. of Recommendations: 4
Goofyhoofy writes,

The thing I never see mentioned in this debate is the "utility of money", it's always about the "quantity of money."

If you're wealthy enough to delay taking SS until age 70, what's the "utility of money"? I assume nobody in that position would delay taking the monthly SS check if it would put crimp in their lifestyle. It's really more a financial optimization exercise.

The bigger problem I see is that most people aren't going to be able say that their life expectancy will differ enough from the median to make a difference. A few people will have serious health problems that definitely argue for taking SS at age 62. And a few people will be in excellent health with parents and grandparents who lived to be 100, making delaying to age 70 a good bet. Everyone else is in that middle grey area where 62 vs. 70 based on your life expectancy isn't much more than a coin toss,

intercst
Print the post  

Announcements

The Retire Early Home Page
Discussion on accelerating retirement day.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement