Greetings, Mr. Jones, and welcome.But I began to think: let us assume that 1/2 of thestocks in the DDA approach turn over each year, andyou must pay a 20% capital gains tax on the gains. Thenputting money in the 401K gives FAR superior returns.Step 4 would seem to be a horrible suggestion. If I'vedone my formulas correctly (see below) Excel showsthe difference to be between $100K and $700K of 1998dollars. Does anyone else have the same findings? Or do youthink my calculations are flawed?Well, they might be flawed and they might not. The problem is we can't tell because you didn't post the assumptions and calculations you used. Offhand I'll posit you erred somewhere. The formula in Step 4 assumes you pay ordinary income tax each year on the return you receive in the taxable account, so the return you must make to equal the 401k is already net of taxes. If in the 401k you get 10.7% and you're in a 28% tax bracket, then your return in a taxable alternative must be ~14.9% to equal the return in the 401k after it, too, has been taxed. Your scenario uses a 20% capital gains rate. That means the needed rate of return drops to ~13.4%, which makes the 17.4% look even more attractive. Show us what you used, and we can verify or refute your hypothesis. BTW, you may want to read Step 4 again -- particularly the proof -- to ensure you haven't missed anything.Regards....Pixy
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar<