Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 1
Greetings, Sonnet, and welcome. You asked:

It is invested in a S&P 500 index and a Russel 2000 index fund, and if I transfered it to an IRA it would most likely be invested the same so why move to an IRA after I retire?

Why indeed?

In your case, a distribution taken from the PLAN (i.e., not an IRA) after you have retired from that job in the year you reach age 55 allows you to take a penalty-free distribution at that age from that job's plan. Move a lump sum to an IRA, and you must wait until age 59 1/2 to that unless you use 72t "substantially equal periodic payment" (SEPP) rules. So, why move it if you're satisfied with the plan and desire the flexibility?

As the the author of the piece you quoted, I should point out that it doesn't say you should move the money. Instead, it merely notes that in most cases (such as the one you cite of taking a lump sum), it makes sense to move the distribution to an IRA to avoid the tax hit. In your case, it seems to make sense not to move the money at all.

Print the post  


What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.