Greetings, Teddywu, and welcome. You wrote in part:<<But did the analysis neglect to account for the future value of yearly tax savings of $560 invested at a IRR of 10% for 30 years ($2000 * 28% tax bracket) in the Traditional IRA case? the sum is something like $92,XXXCan someone confirm this? From this additional contribution, it looks like traditional IRA is far better than a ROTH IRA.>>See my analysis of this issue on this board at http://boards.fool.com/Registered/Message.asp?id=1040013000441002&sort=postdate . In general, if you make a $2K contribution to a deductible IRA versus a tax-equivalent nondeductible contribution to a Roth IRA and if your tax rate falls in retirement, the deductible IRA will win. If your tax rate stays the same, it's a wash. If your tax rate increases, the Roth wins out. OTOH, if you contribute the full $2K to a Roth, then it will win over the full contribution to a deductible IRA even after consideration of an alternative investment of the $560 if your tax rate is the same or higher in retirement. The deductible IRA will be better only if your tax rate falls. See the link for details.Regards….Pixy
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Ra