Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next
Author: TMFPixy Big gold star, 5000 posts Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 19371  
Subject: Re: Social Security 62/65 Article Date: 3/14/2000 2:17 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 0
Greetings, Telone, and welcome. You wrote:

<<Regarding the statement that "taking the reduced benefit at 62 permanently reduces the benefits," mnay I add that the SS rules allow a person who started taking reduced benefits at 62 to exercise an option at 65 (or any age between 62-65) of "buying back" those "before-65-years" by paying back to the SS those benefits previously received and then "upgrading" the benefit to the current time of the buy-back. Thus, at age 64 and 9 months, if a person's "ship came in," the person could pay back to SS the 2 and 3/4 years of previously received reduced benefits, then go on to claim the SS benefits due at 64 and 3/4 years.>>

Unfortunately, that is not true as a quick call to the Social Security Administration will confirm. It's a rumor or old wive's tale that crops up from time to time, but it has no basis in fact. You cannot buy back the age-65 benefit under any circumstances. All that's possible is an increased reduced benefit that may result from additional earnings from work done after benefits have commenced.

<<Also, if one is happily employed, there is an added SS benefit of 5.5% per year (above inflation, wage gains, etc) for every work year beyond 65 for folks like me born in 1934. This added benefit (about $1,000 per year) is far greater in magnitude than any enhanced benefit from replacing a higher earnings year (by working longer) in the 35-high-years-calculation (added benenefit about $150 per year) for benefits since the higher earnings years play a greatly reduced role (percentage-wise) in the SS benefit calculations. And, the higher benefit may provide a spouse a higher benefit (than from the spouse's own work record) once the person retires and will also provide her with this higher enhanced benefit if the person were to "bite the dust."

I'm not advocating this option for anyone -- just providing some information. At the end of the day, it comes down to personal choice >>


That is correct. On reaching age 70, that benefit starts at the increased level even if the recipient continues to work.

Regards..Pixy
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next

Announcements

Pencils of Promise - Back to School Drive
"Pencils of Promise works with communities across the globe to build schools and create programs that provide education opportunities for children."
Managing Your Wealth
Our own TMFHockeypop from Rule Your Retirement fame on the TV show Managing Your Wealth.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement