>> 1. My employer does NOT match funds at all. And currently has no plans to do so. <<Makes it less of a deal. A Roth IRA would almost certainly be better. It also makes taxable accounts with long-term holdings look better, too.>> 2. I was under the impression that I could only contribute $2000 per year in an IRA. <<For a long time, yes. Now it's $3,000 for 2004 and $4,000 in 2005 through 2007. It jumps to $5,000 in 2008.>> 3. Isn't a ROTH IRA an account with Taxable $$? What is the disadvantage to not having money taken out of my paycheck before taxes here? We are talking $12,000+ per year... <<Keep in mind that with a Roth IRA held according to the rules, all earnings can be withdrawn *tax-free*. So in a sense, the Roth IRA is just a "reverse conventional IRA" -- a conventional IRA lets you put in tax-free income to be taxed when withdrawn, and a Roth lets you put in already-taxed contributions to withdraw tax-free. Both also give you the power of compounding returns without intermediate taxes eating into it.#29
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Ra