>Remember, 10% of her pretax salary ($3k) is the roughly the same as 12.5% after tax (assuming a 25% tax rate), or $3750. This means that it costs $750 more to put $3k into a Roth than it does to put it into a 401k. If the fund selection in the 401k is OK, then don't just dismiss it.>Ah,but aren't you looking at the wrong end? She's only 23. At age 65 what does the taxed vs untaxed retirement savings net if later on, at a higher salary, her company begins to match in the 401K? I tried playing around with the fool calulators but I wasn't sure I was doing it correctly because the Roth vs. 401K assumes all or nothing. My gut suggests she's better with a Roth that she could continue for 30 years to net $400K tax free at that point. Now if she had that in a 401K that increased well above the $3K a year and had matching later in her career, she'd probabaly have a million in her 401K which would kick her into a high tax bracket while she'd still have $400K of her Roth tax free. Not sure my assumptions are correct, am willing to hear discussion.
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar<