Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next
Author: rev2217 Big gold star, 5000 posts Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 660  
Subject: Re: Sold IRBT today Date: 3/3/2009 11:20 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 1
Harlen,

Oh, don't get your shorts in a bunch. Even Clinton invested in new projects while cutting military bases. While military spending may decrease overall (and despite your opinion of the current CIC), we can't know what projects DOD may invest in in the hopes of reducing casualty counts.

I'm reminded of a carton that appeared in All Hands magazine (a private publication intended for our Navy's sailors and their families) shortly after Reagan took office. It showed a chief petty officer and a lieutenant standing next to the missile launcher on the forecastle of a guided missile destroyer. The background showed a missile on the launcher with a large suction cup similar to that of a toy dart on the tip. The officer says, "Chief, apparently they are serious about providing real capabilities. This message says to take the suction cups off of the missiles and replace them with warheads."

Seems that we will remain at war for a while according to what I've read. They're talking about deploying lots of troops to Afghanistan and maybe even Pakistan for brief strikes. Robots are perfect for dangerous caves and tunnels that dot the hills of Afghanistan.

That's probably true, but there won't be any money for anything perceived to be "extras" in the budget.

The main issue with that is radio interference as you go deeper into the mountains, but that could be handled, I imagine, with some creativity on the part of the designers.

Radio links for control of military cave robots actually are a bad idea for another reason. A moderately sophisticated enemy like Al Qaeda could use the radio link to hijack the robot. Thus, it's much better to design the cave crawler to let out a twisted pair communication link as it goes into the cave.

Ordinarily I would not argue politics on a company board, but as war policy does have bearing on IRBT, I just wanted to defend my position.

I agree that discussion on company boards should stay on topic, and that general discussion of politics would not be appropriate. OTOH, political issues and policies, either real or proposed, certainly are relevant topics to the extent that they affect a company's future. And in this case, the impact is both obvious and substantial.

Norm.
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next

Announcements

Post of the Day:
Value Hounds

Medallion Financial: TAXI!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement