No. of Recommendations: 2
Heaven help you if you prove to be exceptionally adroit on the accumulation side inside your IRA. Apparently that is verboten.

Verboten according to who? As I understand the proposal, you would be required to take distributions down to $3MM. You'd get to keep the money, but the money would not longer compound tax free until withdrawal. So you'd lose the tax advantage designed for lower and middle income people--which you obviously aren't if you have that much money. In other words, the government doesn't seem interesting in subsidizing retirements for rich people. Let me ask this: Why do you, Catherine Coy, believe that rich people need your tax dollars more than you do?

And you'd have to be not only exceptionally adroit you'd almost have to be magical to get $3MM in an IRA. IRAs were created in 1974 and the contribution limit was $1500/year, which was raised to $2000 in the 1980s, and up to $5000/year in the 2000s. Those are not big amounts. I realize you personally will never be convinced to crack a spreadsheet or use a calculator, but you have to have fargin' amazing returns to get to $3MM, with contribution limits that low. That was by design.
Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.