Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 2
Here are my assumptions for Berkshire's future cost of float which I peg at -0.8%. I use this estimate for a float based valuation but (perhaps inconsistently) I assume underwriting break-even for the two-column method due to a desire to be conservative.

I arrive at the -0.8% cost of float by estimating the cost of float for each of the four reporting groups separately and then coming up with a weighted average. I still penalize General Re for its (now long past) sins and only assume break-even for BH reinsurance. The slight negative cost comes from GEICO and the primary insurers.

It is possible that I'm being way too conservative here but I've been burned with overly bullish float based valuation assumptions in the past.
Print the post  


When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.