Here is a link to world car production.I'm not sure how to respond to this. You seem to be saying, "Here is something that is contributing to the global environmental problem, so that is rationalization for me to not even try to reduce my carbon footprint."I just don't see it that way.China is emerging as a political, social and economic force in the world. Many that were surviving in poverty there are now working their way to a more comfortable middle class existence. That transformation is being paid for with a significant amount of carbon pollution.As much as I wish the above statement were not true, I wonder what option is preferable. Would you prefer to keep Chinese people in poverty? Would you prefer that the industrialized nations of the world pay China to become less carbon dependent while they grow and compete increasingly with us? Real choices involve complex analysis. Any change to carbon footprint of a nation will involve social, political and economic considerations - both short-term and long-term. We really can't expect China, India and the underdeveloped countries of the world to suddenly adopt a total green approach to their development. We can't even do that yet in the US - the wealthiest nation on earth. But we can encourage and help them evolve as we do ourselves. Change is hard. It takes time.
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar<