Hi again Selena... sorry for butting in again, but I think I'm trying to chime in as much as possible to get every 2¢ worth per post!But, seriously: I should point out that I have only been able to make a modest contribution via Foolanthropy, but this is my first every contribution via TMF, and the target charity was Ashoka. Two reasons why: 1) I believe in it's mission from the site and articles I saw and 2) I noticed the glaring difference in contributions to date, Ashoka sadly lagging far behind.I think there are a few possible simple reasons:- Ashoka is possibly the least well-known of all the charities on the list.- The concept is seemingly too radical to what most people think of what an international charity should endeavor to do; it's too "weird" and people don't understand how their individual donation will be applied directly.- Lastly, but not insignificantly, using terms like "social entrepreneur" and "world-changing ideas" sound too vague and kinda off-putting. Those terms don't have the same 'charm' as "ending hunger," "making the poor self-sufficient," lifting the poor out of poverty," and "Saving lives by bringing clean water to developing nations."It's perhaps ironic that most (if not all) of the other charitable organizations could have been started based on Ashoka's principles... Ashoka sounds like it could be a precedent of all the other charities, at some stage, but it's unclear to most people exactly what it does or how it can help.Dunno... if anything, that's my 2¢ worth to Foolanthropy, via TMF.$IQ
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. M