Hi Felix,They have delivered exhaustive evidence that the PDF document presented as though it were Obama's B.C. is a photoshopped fraud.Do you really believe that?Why would anyone of objective logic doubt it, given the actual evidence?If he was born in Hawaii, why the fraud? That's exactly what *I* want to know... why the fraud, if it was theoretically unnecessary?At this point, there's seriously nobody of any credibility claiming the documents are legitimate.That's untrue. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/04/29/expert-says-obama......Your posted 'expert' disclaims *one* point of evidence, and then simply 'declares' “You should not be so suspicious about this,”... hardly defensible objective logic or evidence.A bogus document created to support what may otherwise be true, is still a bogus document... fraud.Yes. We learned that with the forged Bush TANG letters. But it's irrelevant in this case because the documents are not forgeries. And you support this with religious faith, I suppose... like global warming, right?
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Ra