Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next
Author: omahasandman Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 610  
Subject: How I'd Save United Date: 10/25/2001 6:30 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 2
1 Word: Consolidation

For United and other airlines to survive, I think a simple consolidation of fleets will solve a number of problems with minimal impact on the business. By consolidation, I mean establish one plane as THE plane, and sell off everything else. For my money, I would recommend a mid-size Boeing 737.

First, by standardizing the fleet on one plane, United would drastically simplify operations for the following reasons:
- United would only have to train their maintenance staff on one plane, meaning savings in training cost. Additionally, if someone were sick, it would be easy to find someone with the same expertise.
- United could consolidate spare parts. By only having one type of plane to maintain, United could drastically reduce the amount of spare parts, and people working with spare parts issues (i.e. ordering, delivering, etc.)
- Pilots would all be trained on one plane, making it easier to find subs in case of sickness, vacation, etc. Additionally, pilots would likely have more of an incentive not to strike, as someone could be easily found to replace them.

Next, by standardizing on a mid-size plane, United would reduce the manpower needed on certain routes. It simply takes a bigger flight crew to fly a 767 as it does to fly a 737, which brings me to my next point.

Finally, standardizing the fleet should be much easier to do now that the skies are not so full. In the past, certain routes needed a 767 to fly because so many people were on those flights. Now, with flights half full, the process of standardizing on a smaller plane would have a minimal impact on revenue. However, the impact on the bottom line would be huge. Taking the same amount of passengers, only now on a 737 as opposed to a 767, would generate the same revenue, except with much less operating expense (less gas, less time to board, less staff, etc.)

By simplifying operations, United could once again become successful...
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next

Announcements

Foolanthropy 2014!
By working with young, first-time moms, Nurse-Family Partnership is able to truly change lives – for generations to come.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Post of the Day:
Macro Economics

Looking at Currency Ratios
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement