However, I do have a hard time understanding why you consider evolutionary biologists, to be scientists. Evolutionary biologists seem to be for the most part quite inferior mathematicians. That is why evolutionary scientists are not called mathematicians. Mathematicians are generally very poor at examining fossil records, which is why they are not called evolutionary biologists. Does this imply that they should not be called scientists?Science is a lot more than math.David
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Ra