Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 2
I am concerned about someone who classifies a 50% loss as being good performance. I feel a better approach would have been to state that a 50% loss is poor performance. Even if others have done even worse, 50% is a terrible price to pay.

I think the point was that performance if measured after several years, not just one! Remember you aren't supposed to be mimicing their buys and sells - only learning the essence of the investing strategy. With an agressive strategy, like RuleBreaker, a 50% loss is not a big surprise, considering the 199.08% gain in 1998!

It is VERY easy to critisize in hindsight, isn't it?
Print the post  


What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.