I am concerned about someone who classifies a 50% loss as being good performance. I feel a better approach would have been to state that a 50% loss is poor performance. Even if others have done even worse, 50% is a terrible price to pay. I think the point was that performance if measured after several years, not just one! Remember you aren't supposed to be mimicing their buys and sells - only learning the essence of the investing strategy. With an agressive strategy, like RuleBreaker, a 50% loss is not a big surprise, considering the 199.08% gain in 1998!It is VERY easy to critisize in hindsight, isn't it?
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Ra