Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next
Author: edcosoft Big red star, 1000 posts Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 123501  
Subject: Re: TRUST LOAN TAX IMPLICATIONS Date: 7/27/1999 3:13 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 0
I am the trustee of an irrevocable trust for my sister. I recently made a $22k
loan to her from the trust's funds to help her get out of credit card debt. The
terms of the loan (which are memorialized in a signed note) are 15 years at
5 percent interest with payments due monthly. I did this in the form of a
loan rather than just making a straight distribution because I did not want
her to have a huge tax bill and I wanted the monthly payments to be a
constant reminder of the perils of unsecured debt. Will these admittedly
favorable loan terms pass muster with the IRS or will the $22k be
considered a distribution to her which she must claim as income? If this
will be considered income to her, what can I do to fix it?

I don't see that you have any tax problem on the $22K here. If you distribute all the Trust income to her every year anything more would be a distribution from capital, untaxed. If you don't distribute all income to her each year you run into the throw-back rules and have to do a Schedule J, which WOULD be straight income to be taxed, but this (the threat of a Schedule J) should have been enough incentive to have actually distributed all the income to her in the past (or at least "credited" it to her to pay tax on whether actually physically distributed or not).
I personally think you did the right thing, practically, trustee-wize, and to get the point across to her. The interest RATE is somewhat immaterial because it probably just circulates through the trust and is returned to her as taxable income, and isn't deductible by her personally. If the Trust had loaned it interest free it probably would be contested with an imputed interest rate just to get the tax for the IRS on the income versus the non-deductible interest. At no interest, she is avoiding taxable income the $22K would have generated for her, whereas charging her interest replaces some of that but doesn't give her an offsetting deduction. If the Trust was only getting 4.5% interest (or less) on the funds, that is a good argument for your interest rate being reasonable IN THIS CIRCUMSTANCE.
These comments are not professionally inspired, just some common sense. Ed
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next


In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
Foolanthropy 2015!
Fistula Foundation: A World of Good!
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Post of the Day:
Saul's Investing Discussions

Gilead Sciences CC Thoughts
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.