Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 1
I am very interested. he is out in front when it comes to the war issue

Now that's an interesting observation. It was Dr. Dean that jumped on W. at the start. Sure, Clark was critical when he was a talking head for CNN, but it's easy to be an "armchair general". Last week, when the media started sqeezing him on whether he'd have voted for the war resolution he was all over the map. I understand his position. He thought the resolution should have strengthened W.'s hand when he went to the U.N., but he wanted W. to come back to Congress for authorization to go to war. Two things wrong with this argument: 1) Iraq didn't have WMD's, ties to Osama bin Laden, or had imported yellowcake from Niger as W. and his henchmen claimed, so supporting W. shouldn't have been an issue; and 2) How can you trust W? He lies like a cheap rug. Even if a "two part" authorization was expected, once the Pretender had his shred of legitimacy, he was sending in the Marines.

Dr. Dean has opposed the war from the beginning. Even when it was a political liability to oppose W. He said Sadam wasn't linked to terrorist, or a threat to the U.S. I want someone that makes a clear distinction between his position and the neocons that have highjacked our country. Just my $0.02.

Rock Chalk, y'all,

Dr. J. Hawk
Print the post  


When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.