I realize this is the issue, but how do you rationally answer someone who's only argument is personal incredulity?You can't think of a reason why God would create humans with an appendix, so that's it? Even after a scientifically determined use for it is given, it's not good enough.I see. So personal incredulity works just fine as a means of *establishing* God's existence, but it can't actually be used to analyze the implications of his existence. Double standard much?
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Ra