No. of Recommendations: 11
I realize this is the issue, but how do you rationally answer someone who's only argument is personal incredulity?

You can't think of a reason why God would create humans with an appendix, so that's it? Even after a scientifically determined use for it is given, it's not good enough.


I see. So personal incredulity works just fine as a means of *establishing* God's existence, but it can't actually be used to analyze the implications of his existence. Double standard much?
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement