I see. So personal incredulity works just fine as a means of *establishing* God's existence, but it can't actually be used to analyze the implications of his existence. Double standard much? I don't think personal incredulity works well as an argument for anything, God included.I don't agree with the standard misrepresentation of ID as "We just can't figure out how evolution did it, so it must be God".
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Ra