No. of Recommendations: 1
I think our health care system needs to be revised, but I find the idea of guaranteeing coverage for substance abuse quite a problem.

Sure these people need help, but putting that on the back of the health care system to me is likely to be a costly boondoggle.

I recall the Medicare part C story from 1990 or so. In the midst of the AIDs epidemic they passed catastropic illness coverage, in effect requiring the elderly to pay for treatment of AIDs victims. The bill passed, and was signed, but there was such an outcry that Congress repealed the act almost immediately.

Looks like we are headed down this track again. Getting basic coverage for everyone and controlling the rate of growth in costs should be priorities. But I'm inclined to limit coverage for substance abuse (as most health insurance policies already do).

Once again it looks like the liberals have their agenda. Off the deep end if they can get away with it.
Print the post  


What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.