Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 0
I think the statement "So, who do you believe: the anonymous economists cited by The Wall Street Journal, or research conducted by the ICI?" indicates Braze is trying to refute the WSJ article.

I think most of the posters aren't disagreeing with ICI's numbers but rather with Braze's interpretation of them.

To me ICI's numbers seem to support the WSJ statistics rather than Braze's statements.

So I think the answer to the question, "It sure does paint a much rosier picture than that of the Journal article, doesn't it?" is at best a half-empty/half-full observation.

The WSJ's point was just that raising the IRS limits on these accounts probably wouldn't result in more savings to these accounts because few people hit those limits. If either the WSJ or ICI is to be believed, this is a true (and useful) statement.

Of course one should exercise care regarding statistics. I hope Mr. Braze will exercise a little more care.
Print the post  


When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.