Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6) | Ignore Thread Prev Thread | Prev | Next | Next Thread
Author: PopeyesAddict Two stars, 250 posts Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 5238  
Subject: Re: BCS pondering 4-team playoff Date: 7/1/2012 12:50 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 1
I think this is pretty much the ideal, though I worry that they won't hold at 4. I like 4 because I want the minimum number needed to include every team who at the end of the season can legitimately say "We've played the very best season in college football." That is usually 1 to 3 teams. So the fourth gives you insurance and balances out the schedule. There is no way that there are 8 teams who will be able to make that claim. Usually #8 lost two games and/or didn't win their conference.

One of the biggest flaws with the current system* is that you can have 3 very good teams go undefeated and 1 of them gets left out. That happened to Auburn. You could, theoretically, have the same problem with 5 teams, but that is very unlikely. I'm not even sure it's ever happened. So that problem is fixed.

You can still have a team go undefeated and not get a shot at the title. And that will probably happen - which keeps College Football as still the only sport I can think of where that happens. But without expanding the playoffs to 16 teams that can't be fixed.

*So there's been a lot of talk about how NOW we'll have a playoff and that things can be "settled on the field." But really very little has changed. For starters, we've had a playoff since the BCS started. It was just a two-team playoff. Now it will be four. For those who think it's not settled on the field - it still won't be. Teams will play their seasons and then hope that they get picked for the playoffs by a group of judges - same as before. It won't include computers, and the selection committee will work together, instead of in the blind as is done now, but still, if you think it was a beauty contest, it still is.
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6) | Ignore Thread Prev Thread | Prev | Next | Next Thread

Announcements

Post of the Day:
Macro Economics

Intel's Broadwell Potential
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement